Literary forgery
The forgery contains numerous elements typical of what is known in literature as a "false document": a document that is deliberately written to fool the reader into believing that what is written is truthful and accurate even though, in actuality, it is not.[8] It is also one of the best-known and most-discussed examples of literary forgery, with analysis and proof of its fraudulent origin going as far back as 1921.[9] The forgery is also an early example of "Conspiracy Theory" literature.[10] Written mainly in the first person plural,[11] the text embodies generalizations, truisms and platitudes on how to take over the world: take control of the media and the financial institutions, change the traditional social order, etc. It does not contain specifics.[citation needed]
Maurice Joly
Elements of the text in the Protocols were plagiarized from the 1864 book, Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu), written by the French satirist Maurice Joly. Joly's work attacks the political ambitions of Napoleon III using Machiavelli as a diabolical plotter in Hell as a stand-in for Napoleon's views.[5] In the book, Machiavelli describes a series of steps that he intends to take to become ruler of the world.
Hermann Goedsche
Hermann Goedsche's 1868 novel, Biarritz (in English as To Sedan) contributed another idea that may have inspired the scribe behind the Protocols. In the chapter, "The Jewish Cemetery in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel", Goedsche wrote about a nocturnal meeting between members of a mysterious rabbinical cabal, describing how at midnight, the Devil appears before those who have gathered on behalf of the Twelve Tribes of Israel to plan a "Jewish conspiracy". His depiction is also similar to the scene in Alexandre Dumas, père's Joseph Balsamo, where Cagliostro and company plot the affair of the diamond necklace. With Biarritz appearing at about the same time as The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, it is possible that Goedsche was inspired by the ideas in Joly's pamphlet, especially in detailing the outcome of the cabal's secret meeting.[12]
"Goedsche was a postal clerk and a spy for the Prussian secret police. He had been forced to leave the postal work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849."[13] Following his dismissal, Goedsche began a career as a conservative columnist, while also producing literary work under the pen name Sir John Retcliffe.[14] In 1871, the story was being presented in France as serious history. In 1872, "The Jewish Cemetery in Prague", translated into Russian, appeared in St. Petersburg as a separate pamphlet of purported non-fiction. François Bournand, in his Les Juifs et nos contemporains (1896), reproduced a speech from the chapter as that of a Chief Rabbi "John Readcliff".
After reading the document recently, within the pages of former U.S.Naval Officer William Cooper who smartly included it in his book "Behold a Pale Horse" I immediately began to excerpt the information.
My response to charges, written by Jewish persons of course is that it is a forgery, is well of course you will deny and deflect the information. Will that make it less true? Even if all that was and is said in opposition were true, then whoever wrote it, had an incredible working model to suppress the masses, that proves its credibility by the fact that what has been going on world wide seems to follow the plan. Recently and Afghan drug warlord was arrested. Afghan is actually mentioned as part of the ruling elite. (I am still trying to connect the dots.) The smart phone application to snitch on your neighbor and report it to the government is being tested. In Cuba that is what has been going on for the last 50 years. Result? over 20 million persons have been trained to think in terms of ratting on your fellow citizens. Sometimes for an extra piece of meat or 1/2 lb. of sugar.
We live in really nonsensical times. What most people think is hip, cool and innocent is not. Are Jews alone involved? I really don't think so. Do they fit the profile, i.e. holding vast sums of money? yes. Intellectuals yes. That in and of itself indicates someone who read the text, thought it sounded worthy of imitation.
I always wondered why the CIA never killed Castro? I wanted to think he was so macho and clever. But, that is not what am thinking today. How about an agreement ,a clandestine agreement with the United States to not allow nuclear missles on Cuban soil? that sounds plausible to me. At the same time allow the Cuban dissidents in Miami to urge vitriolic rhetoric towards Fidel, to cover up the real actions. Every Cuban who is anti-lifting of the embargo just happens to be deeply entrenched in Washington. A taxi driver from South America, just happened to say the above about the continued life of Castro.
In the Protocols document it says, that the Socialists, Communists and labor groups are exactly the type of people they want, to lead like lost sheep into captivity. Now I ask you, why would Farrakhan Not know this?
I would like to hear opinions. Thank you.
Posted By: Marta Fernandez
Thursday, December 16th 2010 at 12:47PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
